Ohio Homeowners may be able to Assert Failure to Comply with PSA
In several previous posts; April 5, 2013 Failure to Comply with PSA Results in Void Judgment; and
August 2, 2013 Update on Failure to Comply with PSA, I argued that Homeowners facing foreclosure are entitled to assert the failure to comply with the pooling and servicing agreement. I stated that the failure to comply with the PSA would result in a void transfer of the promissory note or a void assignment of the mortgage. In a post September 29, 2015 Anh Nguyet Tran vs. Ban
The Law Office of Bruce M. Broyles: Ohio Homeowners may be able to Assert Failure to C...
The Law Office of Bruce M. Broyles: Ohio Homeowners may be able to Assert Failure to C...: In several previous posts; April 5, 2013 Failure to Comply with PSA Results in Void Judgment; and August 2, 2013 Update on Failure to Comp...
Yvanova vs. New Century Mortgage Corporation No.S218973 Supreme Court of California
When the California Courts issued the decision of Glaski v. Bank of America, supra, 218 Cal.App.4th 1079, I did not get that excited and did not pay much attention. Glaski was issued in a "non-judicial" state; Glaski involved a claim for wrongful foreclosure; it was an appellate decision; and other Appellate decisions distinguished or criticied Glaski. However, the recent decision of Yvanova vs. New Century Mortgage Corporation, in which the California Supreme Court determi